Cambodian tragedy laid on a misunderstood Marx

十月 11, 1996

In his book review of Western Responses to Human Rights Abuses in Cambodia, Richard Gough wonders "how many lives worldwide might have been saved had Karl Marx kept his political and economic theories to himself" (THES, October 4).

It is primarily the distortion of Marx's ideas (of which Cambodia is a particularly tragic example) rather than the ideas per se which have been responsible for the loss of life.

Cyril Smith's new book Marx at the Millennium, to be reviewed by myself shortly in The THES, makes this point forcefully.

The intrinsically humane set of principles, which are associated with the ideas of Marx, can be contrasted with the logic of market capitalism which, without the need for any contortion, spreads poverty, hunger, death and destruction worldwide.

MIKE COLE Faculty of education, sport and leisure University of Brighton

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.