UEA staff to strike over plans to cut more than 150 jobs

Union branch at redundancy-hit institution to stage one-day walkout

三月 20, 2025
Source: iStock/Wirestock

A one-day strike has been announced at the University of East Anglia over plans to cut more than 150 roles.

The University and College Union (UCU) will stage the walkout on 26 March after claiming that one in six staff have been put at risk of redundancy.

UEA is seeking to cut 163 full-time equivalent roles on top of the 400 posts lost in 2023, as it tries to save a further £11 million.

More than half of the latest cuts target the university’s professional services staff while the faculties of medicine, science and arts and humanities will also be affected, losing more than 20 roles each, said UCU.

A strike ballot of union members backed taking industrial action in the dispute by 82 per cent on a turnout of 67 per cent.

UEA staff have previously warned of repeated cycles of job cuts at the university, saying that “appeasing banks” was seen as more important than protecting staff.

The co-chair of the UEA UCU branch, Nadine Zubair, said the dispute aimed to prevent compulsory redundancies and question the financial and business strategy of the university, and its governance.

“We will use our strike day to celebrate staff, to remind the employer that we are the university, that we matter, and that we have a clear and unified voice”, she said.

“There is real power in coming together and acting as a collective in these moments of crisis, and we need to act together to support all our colleagues who are ‘at risk’ of redundancy.”

UCU general secretary Jo Grady said the branch had the “full backing of their national union in continuing industrial action until management starts meaningful negotiations”.

In a statement a UEA spokesperson said it was “disappointed” that the union had decided to strike and “we assure our students that we will make every effort to ensure their student learning experience is protected and they are made fully aware of support services available to them”.

“The university continues to work with our colleagues to deliver the required savings to secure our long-term future,” they added.

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (5)

A strike ballot of union members backed taking industrial action in the dispute by 82 per cent on a turnout of 67 per cent. These figures look at first glance impressive but they seldom report just how many staff have actually voted for a strike or what proportion of the University's total staff voted for strike action. The total UEA staff number is 4,438. Of that number how many voted for strike action or what percentage? And when an institution like UEA is already down on its knees, failing in the dust, what is strike action meant to accomplish? Knock it flat on its back our cold?
The strike action is designed to avoid compulsory redundancies and reform UEA for the better - by securing more transparency and democratic forums for staff. UEA UCU have never said that the institution doesn’t need to save money - years of financial mismanagement mean that (unfortunately) UEA is not well equipped to weather the storm currently bartering UKHE. It’s a question of how these savings are made. As for numbers, UEA UCU has a large membership and a collective bargaining agreement with the University - along with the other campus trade unions, it’s the most representative and democratic body we have at the institution.
"As for numbers, UEA UCU has a large membership and a collective bargaining agreement with the University - along with the other campus trade unions, it’s the most representative and democratic body we have at the institution." You say 'as for numbers' and then don't provide any! 'A large membership'. I guess that's all relative isn't it? Please define what 'a large membership means'. And how are the savings to be made and how are you going to fix that campus of yours that has been failing for the last 15 years or so?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Jolly_Bad_Fellow 'Kerris Bowles-Ottery is professor of science at the University of Ockham. To advance his career, he poisons inconvenient colleagues with an untraceable substance he has discovered that induces hysteria and manic behaviour followed by death.'
new
At least I shall die laughing!
ADVERTISEMENT