Funding formula fails to offer fair rewards 4

三月 12, 2009

In your article on the financial outcome of the RAE, you ascribe the Institute of Cancer Research's 10 per cent decrease in research funding to "disappointing RAE results" ("Reversal of fortunes", 5 March). This is not the case. In your own Table of Excellence, published on 18 December 2008, the institute ranked top, with the highest percentage of 4* plus 3* research of any institution submitting to multiple units of assessment.

Hefce's declared policy was to reward excellence wherever it was found, and it is the Government's policy to maintain support for science. Quite how cutting the budget of the top-ranked institution, which only does science, is congruent with these objectives is something that only Hefce can explain. I and my colleagues look forward to hearing from it.

Peter W. J. Rigby, Chief executive, Institute of Cancer Research.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT