Be fair or be flexible 1

十一月 9, 2007

Take a look at the web home pages of a few US academics and you will see they typically offer a more varied and interesting set of assessments than is the case in the UK ("Inherently frail - the verdict on marking", October 26). This is possible because Americans are not burdened with the extra duties of double marking and external examination.

As I understand it, US instructors are trusted with a greater responsibility for setting the type of assessments they wish to and do not have to jump through the same bureaucratic hoops that we do should we wish to make alterations to our assessment methods. The British assessment system is more concerned with ensuring that assessment loads are roughly equivalent between modules and between courses, and that marking is accurate and fair. Although well intentioned, the bureaucracy required to regulate and monitor assessments also stifles flexibility and innovation.

David Hardman, Department of psychology, London Metropolitan University.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT