Writes and wrongs 3

十一月 11, 2005

If we, as William Leahy seems to suggest, think of argumentation as a skill too "academic" for mere undergraduates, who presumably need only to shuffle papers in some tedious future office career, there is no incentive for us to nurture the skills of good essay writing.

But I believe that rather than, as Leahy argues, ditching the "stringent criteria" and "inappropriate demands" of academic essay writing to avoid plagiarism, we need to help students to acquire the skills that will enable them to write without resorting to plagiarism.

We should neither lower our standards nor insult our students by suggesting that they do not need critical skills. Every time one of our former students writes a letter of application for a job, attends an interview, begins work in our increasingly stressful workplaces, applies for funding or a small-business loan, writes a report or engages in hundreds of other mundane situations during their working life, they will draw (probably unconsciously) on the skills developed at university through essay writing.

It is about time we took seriously the process through which those skills are acquired.

Jessica Bloom American InterContinental University,
London

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT