Divided on quality (3)

四月 12, 2002

David Woodhouse makes the strange assertion that Michael Loughlin's article is UK-centred. Why not, if that is what Loughlin set out to analyse?

Woodhouse thinks academics waste their time by challenging the nonsense of management-speak. But challenging nonsense and promoting good sense is what we do.

I am astounded that Woodhouse thinks we are cynical and arrogant to question the "assurance" given by the QAA and other equivalent organisations. Whatever understanding of quality there is in higher education, most academics work unabated and look after their students diligently.

Nick James
Department of geography
Edge Hill College, Ormskirk

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT