Readers reactions

九月 10, 1999

Last week in The THES... James Tooley argued that British universities were churning out too many graduates and should have their state subsidies withdrawn

If James Tooley believes jobs filled by graduates should be filled by school-leavers, why not fill these jobs with 12-year-olds?

Students like and benefit from going to university. The only way this opportunity can be distributed fairly is via state subsidies. If society does not benefit, we need to re-examine what universities do, not restrict access to those who can afford to pay.

Tooley's views are purely ideological: people should pay market prices for public services including, presumably, health care and schools. Maybe he should stand for election rather than teach education.

Tim Blackman

Professor of sociology and social policy

Oxford Brookes University

I agree with James Tooley.

In view of agriculture minister Nick Brown's censure of sheep farmers for over-production, perhaps it would be sensible to petition the Department for Education and Employment to cull unwanted students.

R. Allan Reese

Hull University

(writing in a personal capacity)

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.