In your rush to stoke a non-existent dispute about metrics ("Humanities overlooked by politicians", 18 September), you missed the point of the British Academy's recent report on the contribution that good research could and should make to good policymaking.
The report, produced by a group chaired by Sir Alan Wilson, identifies a gap between researchers (in humanities and social sciences) and policymakers, to the detriment of both, and makes a number of very practical suggestions about plugging it.
The academy, and the parties who have welcomed the report, are at work on taking forward those recommendations. By the way, the academy's position on metrics is clear: we believe that appropriate metrics can usefully inform, but not replace, expert peer review.
Robin Jackson, Chief executive and secretary, the British Academy.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login