We're lovin' it (not) 3

January 28, 2005

Peter Leapman's arguments are utterly specious and really do not warrant attention. The editorial policy that has (again) allowed such remarks to be published, however, does require further thought and I shall rethink my decision to read your publication in future.

Darren Langdridge
The Open University

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT