(Photograph) - We are what we eat: As new technologies offer improved yields (page 9), the public fears that European and UK controls over food have more to do with encouraging trade and protecting industry than with promoting health. On page 17, Philip James, author of a post-election report on the Government's promised Food Safety Agency, outlines why it should have a wide remit.
Consumers, he argues, will only trust a new agency if it is independent; operates in the open; and covers nutrition and health, pesticides and veterinary medicines as well as the microbiology of food safety.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login