Groups pave the way to work

October 24, 1997

GETTING students to work together on group projects is gradually catching on as a way of preparing students for work. But assessing such assignments has been a major obstacle, writes Alison Utley.

Roger Lloyd-Jones, of Sheffield Hallam's school of cultural studies, is leader of a Higher Education Funding Council for England-backed project to understand the usefulness of group work and solve the assessment conundrum.

"Getting students to work together in groups requires the lecturer to shift roles from leader to facilitator of learning," he says.

This particular project is focused on history students. It is not a question of scholarship versus skills, Mr Lloyd-Jones stresses, but one of introducing flexibility into the curriculum without compromising the integrity of the subject. "What we all want is to turn out good history graduates who can get jobs," he says.

On investigating what employers, including the Ford Motor Company, wanted from graduates, the same qualities, such as problem-solving, effective communication and team-working, kept cropping up. More than two-thirds of employers mentioned team-working as a priority but many complained that it was a skill poorly developed in the education system.

Sheffield Hallam has been using group work across a range of learning programmes for some time. Mr Lloyd-Jones surveyed the responses of 66 students undertaking group assignments culminating in oral presentations of results. The students said they worked harder because everyone's mark depended on it. Nearly all said group presentations would not be taken seriously unless they were assessed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eighty per cent were very nervous about the presentation but afterwards 68 per cent said they had gained in confidence as a result. However, the results were not as positive when students were asked whether their group work deepened their subject understanding. Just 40 per cent said "yes", per cent "no" with the rest undecided. The project found that allocating an individual mark to a group assessment was perfectly reasonable.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Innovation

Global Grand Challenges Summit

An ‘air faucet system’ developed by students at Zhejiang University won first prize in the 2015 Global Grand Challenges Summit. Although...

Promoted by Zhejiang University
Sponsored

AI

NCKU is developing Artificial Intelligence in autonomous driving technologies at the Taiwan CAR lab and in the design and implementation of the humanoid robot and the service robot at its aiRobots Lab.
Promoted by National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)
Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs

Turn innovative ideas into reality

NCEE runs the annual Entrepreneurial Leaders programme, which has had more than 150 senior university leaders take part
Promoted by National Centre for Entrepreneurship in Education
Sponsored
ADVERTISEMENT