Balancing the equation

October 24, 1997

AS WE await publication of the government's white paper on lifelong learning and consider the proper contribution to it of colleges and universities, I do hope the debate will not be conducted by misleading, tabloid-style headlines in The THES.

The complex issues involved must not be reduced to a crude choice between the merits of further and higher education.

I have never advocated that universities should "model" themselves on further education colleges (as my directly quoted remarks demonstrate), nor have I used the phrase that universities need to "sign up" to a new vision.

If I do not explicitly rule things out, that should not suggest that I implicitly rule them in.

I have been very encouraged by universities' responsiveness to the post-Dearing debate and their declared willingness to contribute to the culture of lifelong learning.

R H Fryer Chair National Advisory Group for Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Sponsored

Delivering higher education in London

A London Higher roundtable at THE Live highlighted the city’s higher education success stories and called for affordable student accommodation, more collaboration and the redistribution of wealth
Promoted by London Higher
Sponsored

Helping universities adopt a digital mindset

Higher education leaders met at Microsoft’s Executive Briefing Center to discuss research, artificial intelligence and collaboration with industry
Promoted by Microsoft
Sponsored
ADVERTISEMENT