Climate researcher sacked for refusing to fly loses appeal

Gianluca Grimalda says too many scientists are ‘unaware or not prepared to take action’ when it comes to addressing the impact of work travel on climate

March 4, 2024
Gianluca Grimalda
Source: Gianluca Grimalda

Gianluca Grimalda was 133 posts into a social media thread documenting his fieldwork in Bougainville, Papua New Guinea, when he made an unexpected announcement. The climate researcher had received an ultimatum from his employer at the time, the Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW): return to Germany within five days or be fired.

As a committed “slow traveller”, Dr Grimalda refuses to fly unless strictly necessary in order to minimise carbon dioxide emissions, opting instead to travel by rail, road and sea on trips that can span months. When the Kiel Institute ordered his return last September, he presented them with an alternative six-week travel plan, offering to take unpaid leave for the duration.

“They said no, without any reason,” Dr Grimalda said. “I preferred to stick to my principles rather than give in to this enforcement.” IfW informed him of his dismissal; last month, he lost an appeal to win back his job.

Speaking to Times Higher Education, Dr Grimalda acknowledged that his research – into “the relationship between exposure to globalisation and climate change on one side and egalitarianism on the other” – had taken two months longer than planned due to a series of significant obstacles, among them an armed robbery, volcanic activity and the theft of his possessions and money.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was in touch with my direct supervisor – I thought that was enough,” he said. “On the day I was supposed to be back in Germany, I was still in Papua New Guinea.” But IfW’s demand seemed unwarranted, he said, because he had no in-person obligations: “I work on my data; I don’t have any teaching; I don’t have to be there even when we have meetings – we do them online.”

Inspired by the organisation Scientists for Global Responsibility, Dr Grimalda began slow travelling in 2011 with a trip from Barcelona to Beijing, conducted entirely by coach and train. At first, he said, IfW was supportive. “I was really grateful that they would consider my days of slow travel as days of work. Not all institutes or universities would do that,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When I started, mainly I wanted to be at peace with myself – I really wanted to know that I was doing the right thing,” he continued. But he soon felt that individual action was not enough and began participating in acts of “civil disobedience”, organised by campaign groups such as Scientist Rebellion. On one occasion, he and other scientists chained themselves to the entrance of a private airport in Milan; police severed the chains with bolt cutters and dragged him away by the arms.

His relationship with his employer began to sour. “As soon as they realised that I was doing this kind of action, they threatened me with dismissal immediately,” he said. “It’s possible that there is a link between my civil disobedience and the fact that I lost the job.”

A spokesperson told THE that the Kiel Institute did not comment on “internal personnel matters in public”, adding: “When travelling on business, the institute supports its employees in travelling in a climate-friendly manner. We are committed to do without air travel in Germany and in other EU countries as far as we can.”

The spokesperson added that Dr Grimalda had planned his latest trip “with our support” and that the institute “has always generously supported Dr Grimalda’s wish to travel on business without the use of an aeroplane”.

ADVERTISEMENT

The institute had approved Dr Grimalda’s plans to “slow travel” to and from Bougainville, where he would go on to interview almost 2,000 people across 30 villages. From Germany he travelled largely by land and sea, although the lack of an alternative forced him to fly from Singapore to Papua New Guinea. By his estimation, the 35-day trip cut his carbon dioxide emissions from four tonnes to two.

The journey home spanned 72 days. “I took it a little bit easy, because I was fired,” Dr Grimaldi said. This time there was no need to fly: on ferries, coaches and trains, he travelled through Indonesia, Singapore, China, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Iran, Turkey, Greece and Italy. The return trip, he estimated, emitted 400kg of carbon dioxide: 10 times less than an equivalent journey via plane.

Today, Dr Grimalda is a visiting fellow at the University of Passau, where he will remain for six months before returning to Papua New Guinea to conduct further research. He hopes more scientists will commit to reducing their emissions: at present, he said, “the vast majority are either unaware or aware and not prepared to take action”.

“Every little helps; everything is worthwhile,” Dr Grimalda said. “But I would say even in academia ‘business as usual’ is still the default.”

ADVERTISEMENT

emily.dixon@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (8)

If I walk down any UK High street, I see loads of 'beauty' shops - nail bars, hairdressers, tanning sa;lnos etc etc - that we could all live without. I see loads of otehr shops trhat are not exactly essential to human survival or even fulfillment. If I go off onto the supermarket I see loads of superfluous packaging, and aisles full of wierd stuff trhat is 'edible' but not exactly 'food'. How much environmental impact does all this have? Funny how the eco0-campaigthers aren;t targetting this, rather they go for high profile flkights and road actions.
Thank you for your comments. I hope you can access this chart showing the greenhouse gas emissions impact of the average EU citizen (I guess it's about the same for a UK citizen). The environmental impact of each group of activities depends on the income share you fall into. For a person in the top 10% of the income distribution, transport counts as much as half of all the emissions, even more if you are in the top 1%. Manufacturing amounts to no more than 10%. Source: ZOE institute. Also it's quite paradoxical that when surveys ask people "What are you doing to reduce your emissions?" the most frequent answer is "I recycle plastic" while this has virtually 0 impact on reducing emissions. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DlBODBMsaEGZLe-8hDu8MUBKLxAKcrSc/view?usp=sharing
Nice to get a 3.5 month trip to PNG, must be quite relaxing. When I travel on university business to Asia or the Far East I'm lucky if I get half a day to recover on arrival. And I doubt that my economy seat on Emirates hurts the envoronment - because the aircraft was going to fly anyway, whether I was on it or not!!
Travel days are working days for me, there's no doubt about that and even my ex-employer always recognized that. If you count sleeping in ships infested with bed bugs, or in halls crowded by 100+ people as relaxing, then indeed slow travel is relaxing. I hear many times this story that the airplane flew anyway. Even the trains and the ships I took departed anyway. Less money to the aviation industry means fewer flights in the future, it's the law of supply and demand.
Grimalda only flies when absolutely necessary and does not consider his employer's demand to return within 5 days after a two month extended delay on a project as not absolutely necessary?
#3 @ b.pierscionek888 Exactly, it wasn't necessary because there was nothing I should have done in Kiel that I couldn't have done while travelling. I have no teaching, our departmental meetings are held online and the Institute seminar series has been cancelled. The Kiel Institute knows very well I had nothing to do in Kiel and they never gave any reason why I should have been in Kiel on that day or why they didn't accept my proposal to return on unpaid leave. As a matter of fact, it was impossible to be back in Kiel on the day the Institute wanted, because there were no flights leaving Bougainville on that week - due to fuel shortage. They Institute knew that but they made up I could have travelled by ship to Port Moresby, when there has never been a ship travelling that way.
Thank you for your comments. #1 @DiggingDeeper: I hope you can access this chart showing the greenhouse gas emissions impact of the average EU citizen (I guess it's about the same for a UK citizen). The environmental impact of each group of activities depends on the income share you fall into. For a person in the top 10% of the income distribution, transport counts as much as half of all the emissions, even more if you are in the top 1%. Manufacturing amounts to no more than 10%. Source: ZOE institute. Also it's quite paradoxical that when surveys ask people "What are you doing to reduce your emissions?" the most frequent answer is "I recycle plastic" while this has virtually 0 impact on reducing emissions. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DlBODBMsaEGZLe-8hDu8MUBKLxAKcrSc/view?usp=sharing
#2 @ SL-in-Post-92 : Travel days are working days for me, there's no doubt about that and even my ex-employer always recognized that. If you count sleeping in ships infested with bed bugs, or in halls crowded by 100+ people as relaxing, then indeed slow travel is relaxing.

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT