One committee, bad. . .

September 27, 1996

Richard Nicholson (THES, September 13) complained that the Nuffield Council on Bioethics report Animal-to-human transplants: the ethics of xenotransplantation did not suggest "how successful animal studies needed to be before starting human trials".

The report proposed an advisory committee on xenotransplantation that would approve any trials involving human recipients and the centres that may undertake such trials. The report went on to state: "No xenotransplantation trials involving human recipients should proceed until the proposed committee [. . .] is in place [. . .]."

To the best of my knowledge no one in this country has suggested that the assessment of the animal trials should be left to the research ethics committee of a single institution.

DAVID SHAPIRO Executive secretary Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Sponsored

AI Hospital

NCKU College of Medicine–Taiwan’s leading research center for enterovirus, dengue fever, oncovirus, geriatric medicine, and neurology–emphasizes both medical professionalism and humanism in its medical training.
Promoted by National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)
Sponsored

How can universities adapt during Covid-19?

Coursera has published a guide to help higher education institutions in varying stages of digital transformation prepare for long-term virtual learning amid Covid-19
Promoted by Coursera
Sponsored
ADVERTISEMENT