One committee, bad. . .

September 27, 1996

Richard Nicholson (THES, September 13) complained that the Nuffield Council on Bioethics report Animal-to-human transplants: the ethics of xenotransplantation did not suggest "how successful animal studies needed to be before starting human trials".

The report proposed an advisory committee on xenotransplantation that would approve any trials involving human recipients and the centres that may undertake such trials. The report went on to state: "No xenotransplantation trials involving human recipients should proceed until the proposed committee [. . .] is in place [. . .]."

To the best of my knowledge no one in this country has suggested that the assessment of the animal trials should be left to the research ethics committee of a single institution.

DAVID SHAPIRO Executive secretary Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

With big trees comes great responsibility

UCT postgraduate researcher, Witness Kozanayi, investigated how commercialisation of baobab products has affected the trees – as well as the communities around them.

Promoted by University of Cape Town
Sponsored

Graphene research that breaks the mould

Alfaisal University’s development of polymer nanocomposites is creating new materials with exceptional properties
Promoted by Alfaisal University
Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs

Arts and Sports

The popularity of Zhejiang’s aquatic events is such that it has attracted support from local government and industrial partners alike, as well widespread media coverage and a visiting delegation of sports students from MIT,...

Promoted by Zhejiang University
Sponsored
ADVERTISEMENT