China Subject Ratings 2024: the fifth edition
The ratings were developed with a clear China focus, but they offer global context, says Phil Baty
The ratings were developed with a clear China focus, but they offer global context, says Phil Baty
There is no single or ‘correct’ way to rank universities – and that’s a very good thing, writes Phil Baty
Collaboration has been a hallmark of THE’s rankings for the past 20 years. This is how we’ve worked with the global sector to produce league tables that meet the needs of universities
The inaugural Sub-Saharan Africa University Rankings call attention to the region’s success and provide a framework for development, writes Phil Baty
African rankings methodology looks beyond traditional research-focused metrics on teaching and research to include societal impact, writes Phil Baty
Why we provide bespoke data guided by the local context
The China Subject Ratings use a bespoke set of parameters to enable key comparisons with global universities
The growing strength and expanding influence of China’s universities calls out for a yardstick that benchmarks the sector’s areas of excellence on both domestic and international terms. Our China-...
The rankings are a collaborative global effort, and all who contribute deserve thanks, says Phil Baty
Our survey offers vital insights and data to help universities thrive, says Phil Baty
Our Impact Rankings are global proof positive that universities do a power of good, writes Phil Baty
We’ve added bold metrics, improved methodology and widened our coverage, Phil Baty writes
The look of success can be fresh-faced as well as weathered and time-worn, Phil Baty writes
The region has had a tumultuous year, yet there is unmistakable progress to extol, says Phil Baty
Institutions and systems throughout the region are beefing up their performances – and it shows, says Phil Baty