Australia’s tertiary education system is at odds with the times

The changing nature of work and technology, as well as an evolving population and environment, call for a more inclusive system, says Alec Cameron

九月 18, 2023
A kookaburra sits on a solar panel
Source: iStock

Australia, and the broader Asia Pacific region, need hundreds of thousands of skilled, knowledgeable people in the next two decades to grow equitable prosperity and provide care in our community. That will require widened participation in tertiary education and lifelong learning for all.

It is time to leave behind the idea that the degree or training programme in which a young person first enrols is a unique opportunity to shape the trajectory of their working lifetime. And it is time to leave behind the idea that a higher education qualification alone is the primary measure of success.

As the pace of change and technological advancement accelerates, we need to make a fundamental shift away from the outdated distinction between knowledge and skills that is built into our current post-school education structures.

Australia needs to address the policy and funding divides between vocational education and higher education to achieve more holistic, successful outcomes.

We need advanced knowledge and skills, in novel and widespread combinations, both to maintain democratic and community participation and to fill the jobs currently being created across our entire economy – in energy, construction, environmental science, finance, computing, health and community services.

Although universities can evolve to offer different specialisms in teaching and research, we also need to intensify our engagement with industry and community during the next phase of reform – moving beyond a “predict and provide” skills model and developing local infrastructure in cities and regions to support innovation for our future economy.

The “mid-tier” between the school-leaver certificate and the traditional undergraduate degree is the skill level where there is currently significant unmet demand in key national priority areas.

This cohort of the workforce is disproportionately affected by the failure of the current tertiary education system to offer durable and accessible pathways between work and education, and it is most affected by job insecurity, pay insecurity and underemployment as industries transform around us. Based on available data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, RMIT estimates that there are approximately five million Australians in this group.

This presents an opportunity to design and deliver improvements to the currently offered associate degrees, higher apprenticeships and advanced diplomas, including devising better funding models. If Australia is serious about its intent to design a system that encourages lifelong learning, we must recognise, for instance, that adult learners require education solutions that accommodate their need to work alongside study. “Earn and learn” courses, as well as more modular, stackable and transferable units of study, including microcredentials, should be better understood, supported and integrated into a more aligned, inclusive skills-based tertiary system. 

Current work-integrated learning models are better suited to those entering tertiary education directly from, or shortly after, leaving school or full-time study. An example of how we can do better by mature students and those in under-represented and equity cohorts is the Higher Apprenticeships Pilot (HAP) that RMIT has developed with government and seven industry partners. Employers – many of them social services employers who are struggling to attract and retain workers – hand-pick existing front-line supervisors and team leaders whom they believe would benefit from a co-designed, scalable and sustainable higher apprenticeships model, learning while undertaking on-the-job training. Many of those they nominate are mid-career, predominantly female workers, some in precarious or vulnerable work, and the pilot has seen a qualification completion success rate of 87.5 per cent – far higher than the norm for diploma-level qualifications in Australia.

RMIT strongly supports the proposition in the Australian Universities Accord Interim Report that “the goal of reform must be growth for skills through greater equity”. We will not address pressing skills shortages by maintaining a narrow focus on post-school leavers and those in the 25-34 age bracket, and educational institutions should not seek to pursue academic purpose independently of our societal and economic context. Higher education and vocational education can work together to support the myriad journeys through learning and work, giving people flexible options to meet their life goals as those evolve.

The accord presents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rethink fragmented commonwealth and state funding and policy models to overcome outdated distinctions between knowledge and skills and build co-investment confidence with students and employers.

In our shared pursuit of a fair and equitable Australia, let’s level what is arguably the most important playing field of all.

Alec Cameron is vice-chancellor and president of RMIT University, Melbourne.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

We have 3 generations who have benefitted from study at RMIT in vastly different courses, my own including electrical engineering and management. Part of the strength has been the involvement of leaders experienced in industry to share knowledge as lecturers. The availability of part-time courses which can be attended by those in full-time employment combines acquisition of knowledge with experience in applying that knowledge leading to further learning.
ADVERTISEMENT