Don't stifle debate 1

八月 22, 2003

Michael Rutter's review of Frank Mieles' Conversations with Arthur Jensen is suitably ambivalent (Books, THES , August 8).

Rutter has previously suggested that some tendencies, including criminal, are fixed and can be diagnosed at birth.

Jensen was physically assaulted and was prevented from speaking about inherited intelligence after his seminal Harvard Educational Review article. The opposition was not scientific but ideological with the objective of an equality of outcomes. But opponents were never able to disprove the genetic basis of intelligence.

Rutter also describes the Pioneer as "a charity widely regarded as racist in its aims". But if research is scientific it cannot be "racist".

Jensen received no complaints on his recent tours of India and China. Jensen and Hans Eysenck remain the two most cited psychological sources. Opponents cannot keep the lid on the debate of inherited intelligence.

Angela Pinter
London E2

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT