Under-fire Cardiff v-c calls out ‘fake news’ in epigenetics row

Leader of Welsh institution, already under pressure over massive job cuts, claims words were “grossly misinterpreted”

三月 7, 2025
Wendy Larner
Source: Jared Gray

The under-fire vice-chancellor of Cardiff University has dismissed criticisms of her as “fake news”, as staff described “tense” relations at the institution.

Wendy Larner, who has faced intense scrutiny since announcing plans to cut 400 academic jobs in January, hit out at a recent article in Nation.Cymru that quoted claims suggesting that she believed poverty may be caused by genetics.

The article quoted a Substack post which in turn quoted a 2018 interview with Larner in which the social scientist flagged the rise of epigenetics, the study of how cells control gene activity.

“If things like poverty have a genetic explanation, the taken-for-granted approaches and conceptual frameworks we use as social scientists to explain poverty will need to be reworked,” said Larner, who has led Cardiff since 2023.

The Nation.Cymru article quoted a spokesperson for the Cardiff branch of the University and College Union, who described Larner’s comments as “disturbing”.

“It is shocking that someone in…Larner’s position should say such seemingly offensive and insensitive things, but sadly our members are now used to being shocked by her conduct,” the union said.

In what has been seen as an unusual step, Larner responded to the accusations in an all-staff email, seen by Times Higher Education, claiming that her words had been “grossly (and wilfully) misinterpreted”.

“To claim that I believe there is a link between genetics and poverty is an extremely personal attack that is unacceptable…I am discussing epigenetics (not genetics), arguing that should a proven link be made between epigenetics and poverty, we would need to rethink the existing related theory,” the vice-chancellor writes.

Larner says that it is “deeply disappointing” that the union had chosen to “endorse” the article.

“Scrutiny is to be expected, however, this false report (fake news if you will), and its subsequent endorsement by UCU must be a one-off. We are better than this,” Larner adds.

The debate comes amid mounting anxiety about the impact of Cardiff’s cuts on the Welsh higher education sector, with courses in ancient history, modern languages, music and nursing among those set to be scrapped.

Staff have described the atmosphere at the university as “very tense”, and a subsequent email sent from the union to its members – also seen by THE – describes a “climate of fear” on campus.

The branch claimed that the university had threatened it with an investigation under its dignity at work policy, which seeks to prevent harassment and bullying, a move which it said it was “deeply concerned” by.

UCU also claimed that university management had not stuck to its pledge to hold meetings with unions every fortnight.

“Senior managers seem to have forgotten the massive power imbalance between themselves and the rest of us and have chosen here to play the role of victim. We stand by our claim that the [vice-chancellor and university executive board] are not worthy of our trust, and we urge all university staff to engage with our vote of no confidence,” the union’s email added.

A Cardiff University spokesman said that a letter it sent to UCU had not threatened the branch with an “investigation” but that it had expressed “dismay and disappointment at the unacceptable comment from a UCU spokesperson”.

“The letter made it clear that we have endeavoured throughout the consultation to work fairly and transparently with UCU colleagues and to treat everyone involved in navigating through these challenging and difficult proposals with dignity, courtesy, and respect, and importantly to respect and acknowledge the views of all,” the university spokesman said.

“The letter also expressed disappointment with the increasingly personal attacks on members of the university community and made it clear that this is not acceptable at any time or against anyone. It confirmed if this approach continues, we may have no alternative but to review such statements as a potential breach of our Dignity at Work and Study policy.”

In a separate development, Cardiff’s senate – its top-level staff forum, including Larner and other managers as well as elected representatives – passed a motion criticising the university’s planned cuts. “Owing to the lack of a clear and compelling business case, the senate is not convinced on the evidence shown of the necessity for and validity of the Academic Futures project as a path to a sustainable future for our university,” said the accepted motion.

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

new
It may not be surprising to hear that, after deploying very reductive pseudo-Darwinian language over the last few weeks counseling that we must "adapt and survive" (do all our current University VCs rely on the same A-level primer for their strategic lexicon and do they think we don't notice?), Prof Wendy Larner (Vice-Chancellor of the University Of Wales, Cardiff) allegedly (she denies this, though her words were recorded), invoked other modes of sophistcated biological determinist thinking to underpin the complex zeitgeist of her general approach to research and university management. This body of thought, she suggestively adumbrates with an equally deterministic, arguably socially-darwinistic, recourse to larger technological forces (Big Data, maybe AI) as a means to understand the present academic and cultural landscape and to support her rather iconoclastic, certainly controversial, claim that the Arts and Humanities and Social Sciences will soon likely be hollowed out and rendered, in some way, less relevant, marginal perhaps, possibly useless in the sense we understand them; but, at all costs, certainly not worthy of any substantive investment or funding. Personally, and with the greatest respect, I feel compelled, in this instance, to volunteer my personal opinion, that I possess slightly less than total confidence in Prof Larner's expertise and understanding of these larger areas, or her ability to foretell our future in any productive manner. I would prefer, as the humane and professional manager (the job she is well-paid to undertake) that we all know that she is, that she focuses more precisely on the interests of her academic staff and students in all the disciplines her University contains. These, I would respectfully remind her, are individual human beings with hopes, ambitions, dreams, and ideals who work very hard for the institution that she and her Executive Board manage at some considerable cost to her University. These numerous individuals, who are now highly anxious about their situations, have their careers, their families, their mortgages, their personal debts (in many cases). They have made their decisions to pursue and devote themselves to a career in public education and simply (in my personal view) do not deserve this rather cavalier and high-handed treatment. I do hope that, thanks to some excellent and dedicated journalism from Nation.Cymru and others, Prof Larner and her fellow VCs (her 'partners in crime' in the popular parlance) will now begin that challenging process of beginning to understand that the UK Higher Education system is not simply a plaything for them to experiment with their particular half-arsed pre-occupations, but a rather more serious matter. They are not performing g in an episode of The Apprentice or Dragon's Den and it certainly is not the latest installment of The Terrifier horror film franchise and they are not to act as the redoubtable "Art the Clown" up to his old tricks again with the lives of their staff. In particular, we hope that Prof Larner may, in time and on on sustained reflection, eventually come to see that her Human Resources Departments and our EDI and Dignity at Work legislation are not composed of a series of levers by which she may pursue the harassment of those who disagree with her (largely, it seems, by the extraordinarily underhand tactic of simply quoting her own words) or in any way question her stewardship of one of our great Universities. Of all the allegations raised, I think that last one is by far the most serious as it indicates (if it is true and one really does hope it is not), a degree of personal vindictiveness that should play no part in the management of such serious matters. This story is not just the run of the mill ones. It may be a turning point and a moment in which our VCs and Senior management are subject to public scrutiny (in the fullest sense) for their professional conduct during this difficult time for everyone. We all know Brandel's wise adage that “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants”.
ADVERTISEMENT