University of West London promises fully in-person teaching

As most universities say they will keep some elements online in the autumn term, London institution plans to buck the trend

九月 1, 2021
Interior view of Heartspace as the niversity of West London announces fully in-person teaching
Source: UWL

The University of West London (UWL) has broken from the rest of the UK sector and promised “no more online learning” when students return in September.

It has become the first institution to make such a bold pledge, with most universities stating that they will keep at least some learning online in autumn 2021.

However, Anthony Woodman, deputy vice-chancellor of the university, told Times Higher Education that the government had “given us the opportunity, should we wish and if we are able to manage, to be able to work on site” – and so the institution would do so.

A THE survey carried out in July found that the majority of universities were planning to have large lectures online, with 61.5 per cent of the institutions surveyed saying they would do so. Of the 35 per cent that said they planned to hold at least some in-person lectures, all also said they had discovered benefits to online offerings throughout the pandemic and would be keeping “some of the best elements” digital.

Although institutions have insisted that such decisions are based on pedagogical reasoning, the plans have not been received well by some elements of government, the press or the public.

Professor Woodman said that “of course” UWL’s learning technology had been enhanced by the switch to online learning at the start of the pandemic, but that it would now remain as “a really good, high-quality, informative, supportive adjunct to that face-to-face teaching”.

He explained that UWL’s decision “is what works for our staff and our student demographics. I would be the last person to turn around and say: ‘If we can do it, why can’t others?’ Each university is different. What works for us might not work for others in the sector.”

It was not helpful when politicians “make blanket statements that online doesn’t work”, continued Professor Woodman, saying that he “doesn’t believe there are any universities not having in-depth discussions about what is best for their students”. UWL made its decision “based on the courses that we offer and the students that choose to study here”, he said.

He pointed out that 67 per cent of UWL students were mature learners and that about 92 per cent could be classed as commuters.

“Demographics make a difference,” Professor Woodman said. “We were very quickly made aware of the complexities of not having a safe, secure, comfortable place with good IT, that many of our students faced.

“One of the biggest things we realised, for example, was that perhaps we had taken for granted before how much the library is a foundation stone to the university and what an important factor it is to students.”

What’s more, he went on, a large proportion of UWL’s subjects were practical based, which required in-person lessons. For this reason, teaching at the university had been largely in-person since the start of 2021, when the government implemented a phased approach to campus returns and practical courses were the first allowed back.

Professor Woodman said that while staff appeared keen to get back to in-person teaching “as the biggest energy is seeing your students thrive and your students succeed”, the leadership team would continue a dialogue with unions and all staff about what they were comfortable with.

The pandemic has “really taught us what being healthy means”, he said. “Ultimately, this also comes down to the mental health of both our staff and our students.”

anna.mckie@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (13)

Some sanity at last. Our students were never at risk and our universities have let them down disgracefully. It was sad to see how many academics bough into the official fears and didn't have the whit to read the evidence and sign the Barrington Declaration.
Oh dear!
well done, UWL Good luck
The Barrington Declaration was not based on evidence. Just a load of wishful thinking.
No wishful thinking. The outcomes prove it: Now it's clear that vaccines aren't nearly as effective in preventing infection and transmission as a natural exposure to a virus that is only fatal in old people in poor health. I'm 70 years old, take minimal exercise and drink too much, but I was happy to do my gratis lectures if our institution would have allowed it. 6 members of my immediate family have had the virus and my student granddaughters were over it in 3 days. My hypertensive 75 year old sister took longer and her 78 year old husband needed supplemental oxygen, but they're fine. Why destroy society for people who've lived their lives and are on borrowed time. If covid doesn't get us the next bad flu will. Life is for living not for cringing in fear.
Dunno… the evidence is pretty clear that students moving in leads to more Covid cases. https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/CovidEconomics80.pdf#Paper1 It’s going to be an interesting Autumn. Policymakers have really not internalised that those least likely to be vaccinated (or had two jags) are those very same people some folks are very keen on getting together in a room. And this is before we completely discount the long term costs of long Covid.
What're called "cases" is open to interpretation. What matters is the death toll and that's miniscule now that the medics know how to treat the old people with co-morbidites.
Cases are legitimately tested number of people who had contracted Covid -19. As you may not know, even being double jagged does not prevent getting long Covid. Now with regards to the paper, the student effect is anything is underestimated as last autumn close contacts were not told to test. People were simply told to isolate. So the potential for students moving in to towns and cities to really increase cases , with potentially disastrous results should be taken carefully in consideration by policymakers.
Cases are legitimately tested number of people who had contracted Covid -19. As you may not know, even being double jagged does not prevent getting long Covid. Now with regards to the paper, the student effect is anything is underestimated as last autumn close contacts were not told to test. People were simply told to isolate. So the potential for students moving in to towns and cities to really increase cases , with potentially disastrous results should be taken carefully in consideration by policymakers.
Cases are legitimately tested number of people who had contracted Covid -19. As you may not know, even being double jagged does not prevent getting long Covid. Now with regards to the paper, the student effect is anything is underestimated as last autumn close contacts were not told to test. People were simply told to isolate. So the potential for students moving in to towns and cities to really increase cases , with potentially disastrous results should be taken carefully in consideration by policymakers.
You would think that a uni with such a large % of mature students would be more inclined to opt for online rather than on campus.
The emergence of a new variant or the increasing rise in cases and deaths will presumably lead to a hasty reconsideration of this plan. There would be very few Universities that would recklessly gamble with students' health. Online teaching can be better than face to face if you have academics with the digital skills to create engaging content and a good VLE to deliver it.You also then reap the benefits of learner analytics which can prompt interventions which could be missed in a face to face environment. It is the future and we should embrace it as part of a blended teaching model.
Great decision by UWL. I am a UWL student and online lectures soiled my one complete year of study. Online lectures are very dull and just provide hardly 30% of learning. Covid is going to be with us and institutions are to adjust their system with it but at the cost of students learning and their career. Online classes are a curse
ADVERTISEMENT