Who needs a PhD?

八月 20, 1999

Recent correspondence on the PhD as preparation for an academic career (Letters, THES, August 6 and 13) has rather assumed a necessary link.

The PhD is, and should be, a preparation primarily for research. Research is highly desirable, and we need more of it. But for the large majority of academic staff it is not - and never will be - their main activity. This is all the more certain as higher education expands.

What I dream of is a professional doctorate in higher education. This would systematically train graduates in the theory and practice of all the tasks they will have to carry out in greater or lesser degree: teaching, assessment, administration (including clerical skills), counselling, public relations, history and philosophy of higher education, internal politics (I am not joking) and, yes, a significant research element. It would be exactly analogous to professional doctorates in other fields such as my own of psychology.

Perhaps such a thing is in train somewhere. However, I doubt it, given the overwhelming prestige of research alone in career achievement and the straitjacket of the present assessment systems.

John Radford Department of psychology University of East London

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.