Helen Sword's piece on academics writing for a wider audience ("Narrative trust", 6 September) omitted to mention some of the pitfalls.
For example, the more carefully written a piece is, the more likely it is to be brutally copy-edited by a staffer ignorant of the elementary rules of grammar.
At least one monthly with a large circulation believes in inserting into one's text chunks of misleading and irrelevant data couched in stodgy prose copied word for word from Wikipedia: the editor proudly informed me that as editor he had the final say in the phrasing and content of material published under my name.
A.D. Harvey, London
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login