David Runciman argues that low electoral turnout creates a legitimacy problem (Opinion, September 29). But does it?
Democratic legitimacy derives from franchise, not turnout. There are many reasons why people do not exercise their right to vote, but the effect of their decision is implicitly to endorse whatever choice is made by those who do.
Thus, taking the example of the past general election, the 39 per cent of the electorate who did not vote by their (in)action endorsed the outcome. It is only when people are denied the right to vote that the outcome lacks legitimacy.
Chris Grey
Cambridge University
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login