It is sad, but perhaps not surprising that in a desperate search for the holy grail of top research assessment exercise ratings some universities are employing "phantom" staff ("Paid to be on RAE stand-by", November 2). But one wonders whether the universities pursuing such policies have thought through all possible consequences of such a high- risk strategy. The, mostly US, academics, who are being hired to massage the RAE submissions have high profiles and will be easily identified by the RAE panel members. That is why the universities seeking to spice up their submissions in this way should first find out whether such attempts to hoodwink the panels, if detected, would carry any penalties.
Dipak Ghosh, Stirling University.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login