Richard Baggaley (Letters, December 22/29) suggests scientists should be encouraged to write books. A better goal would be to induce scholars in sociology and the humanities to write fewer.
Articles in good journals are easily accessible electronically; books may be dear to buy, difficult to borrow and deadly to read. But books have been fetishised by promotion panels, despite being subject to softer peer review, so academics feel compelled to crank them out.
Baggaley finds some journal articles narrow, cautious and inconsequential: too many books are all those things at ten times the length.
David Voas
Manchester
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login