The interests and skills associated with being a vice-chancellor described in "Breeding leaders" seem reasonable enough: research and publications, advising senior staff, controlling costs, ventures to attract new students and so on. But how can these leaders explicitly develop a style of thinking across their institutions that means that outrageously expensive, happy-clappy initiatives such as Parliament's agreement to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 80 per cent are far less likely to recur?
Neil Richardson, Kirkheaton
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login