If psychotherapists want respect for alternatives to randomised controlled trials, they must outline them clearly, not model their rhetoric on that of homeopaths (“Jury’s out on trial by ideological ordeal”, Letters, 14 February): “cowed and brutalised by the combination of accountancy and mathematics” translates to me as “they won’t let us spend money on therapies with no provable effect”. Funny that.
Farah Mendlesohn
Anglia Ruskin University
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login