Stifled by impact

September 8, 2016

Peter Taylor-Gooby’s admission that his research has had minimal social impact is refreshing (“Professor turns to novel writing as his research ‘had no impact’”, News, 1 September). I wonder if one of the reasons why today’s social scientists have had such limited positive impact on society is because of the stultifying and deradicalising demands of research assessment exercises. If Taylor-Gooby (among others) had not been so distracted, might we have had the benefit of his “imaginative” thinking long before now?

Robert M. Page
Birmingham


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Analytics for Learn. Case Study White Paper of Saudi Arabia institutions

As the Saudi region moves forward and e-learning, blended learning and distance-learning become more common, it seems clear that the data analysis that Analytics for Learn provides will be crucial in understanding students’ needs and enabling high-level d
Promoted by Anthology
Sponsored

Seeing the brain through the eyes

A neurosurgeon at the University of Cape Town is pioneering a way to diagnose a brain condition through patients’ eyes.

Promoted by University of Cape Town
Sponsored
ADVERTISEMENT