UK short of specialist careers advisers for PhD students

Lack of expertise may make it impossible for universities to meet minimum standards set by research funders

November 15, 2024
Hikers consult a map at Kirkstone Pass near Windermere to illustrate UK short of specialist careers advisers for PhD students
Source: myLoupe/Universal Images Group/Getty Images

A shortage of specialist career advisers for PhD candidates could make it impossible for UK universities to meet new minimum standards of care towards doctoral students, it has been warned.

Under UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)’s “statement of expectations for doctoral training”, which took effect earlier this year, institutions are asked to “provide high-quality professional development options” for PhD students seeking careers advice, with a commitment that this will happen in the “first year of doctoral training to enable students to make informed choices”.

However, a new paper from the Careers Research and Advisory Centre (Crac), commissioned by UKRI, warns how the requirement for a “systematic careers conversation with a professional” which is “hinted at” in UKRI’s new guidelines might not be possible given the lack of dedicated careers staff for PhD students.

Given that there is only one dedicated doctoral careers adviser for every 3,000 PhD students in the UK, according to research by the Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services (Agcas), this ratio “could mean 1:1 engagements are not currently feasible”, says the study.

ADVERTISEMENT

Author Robin Mellors-Bourne, Crac’s director of research and intelligence, told Times Higher Education that while he welcomed the revised UKRI expectations on careers advice for PhD students, which were “dramatically better” than the “very thin” expectations published in 2016, these requirements could be hard to achieve in light of the lack of specialist careers advisers.

“The bigger research-intensive universities may have a few, but most institutions do not,” said Dr Mellors-Bourne.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There is a spectrum of careers advice available in universities but it generally caters to undergraduates – partly because universities are judged on graduate employment metrics these days, so this is where the resources are centred.”

Without enough staff geared towards post-PhD employment advice, the onus was likely to fall on doctoral supervisors, Dr Mellors-Bourne continued.

“We should not be expecting supervisors to have that level of knowledge about potential career opportunities, which can be very varied – they should be encouraging a curiosity of what might be possible, but shouldn’t be the only source of advice,” he said.


Campus resources for early career researchers


While bespoke careers advice was important for PhD students, Dr Mellors-Bourne said he believed a “broader conception of careers advice” was required, in which contact with different industry professionals was integrated into PhD training.

ADVERTISEMENT

“For undergraduate degrees, courses are designed to ensure students have to reflect on a careers question in every single year, pushing them to engage with careers services – that isn’t happening at PhD level, but training could be tailored so there is some trigger for careers support in the first year,” he said.

The recommendations from the Crac report have been welcomed by Agcas. Claire Toogood, the organisation’s research and intelligence director, said that while “the shortage of specialists in this area is a concern”, Agcas supported Crac’s recommendation “that career learning should be both perceived as integral to doctoral training and developed in a much more embedded way within doctoral study”, and its call for universities to “employ and develop the specialist staff needed to deliver this work”.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Because the focus here is on how many PhDs you can pump out (PGR/FTE) numbers rather than the quality of the PhDs. If the focus was more on fewer PhDs working on important and significant problems in the area and the potential for producing outstanding and impactful work there would be fewer students who could be funded and supported better and the advisors would have more skin in the game. Another case of when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. Doctoral training along the lines of a US PhD is something that UK could learn from and benefit.

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT