US alarm over poor literacy

January 27, 2006

Fewer and fewer American university graduates, raised on watching TV and surfing the web, know how to read and understand a book, according to a new national study of 19,000 people.

The study, by the Government's National Centre for Education Statistics, found that only 31 per cent of graduates could read a complex book and extrapolate from it. A decade ago, the proportion was 40 per cent.

Some 3 per cent of adults, or about 7 million people, were nonliterate, meaning that interviewers could not communicate with them in English. Even among graduate students, only 41 per cent could read and understand information in short texts, including product labels, compared with 51 per cent ten years ago.

Mark Schneider, NCES commissioner, did not have a solid explanation for the figures. He suggested that while people had become more literate with computers and other technology, they were losing the ability to read.

About 13 per cent of all adults had below-basic literacy, meaning they could not do much more than read and sign a simple form.

Some 63 million had basic literacy - they could understand information in a pamphlet about serving on a jury. Ninety-five million had intermediate literacy - they could look something up in a dictionary or encyclopaedia.

The US already has a worrying lack of graduates fluent in languages considered essential to national security.

This month, George W. Bush launched a $114 million (£64 million) programme to expand the teaching of Arabic, Urdu and Farsi. The National Security Language Initiative aims to produce 2,000 advanced speakers of Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Hindi and Central Asian languages to enhance not only national security but cultural understanding.

The Defence Department alone needs 3,000 people a year with basic language skills, yet among university students, less than 8 per cent take foreign language courses and only 1 per cent pursue a degree in a foreign language.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

'About 13 per cent of all adults had below-basic literacy, meaning they could not do much more than read and sign a simple form. Some 63 million had basic literacy - they could understand information in a pamphlet about serving on a jury. Ninety-five million had intermediate literacy - they could look something up in a dictionary or encyclopaedia.' My maths isn't that good but isn't that nearly all of them? I have a beef with a wealthy world where this is normal but higher education is left so difficult yet you can't make a living when you've completed your course or possibly several courses each one more difficult than the last.
I'd like to clarify what I wrote last time: I couldn't find a good job in the UK despite trying for years and that was despite having a degree and qualifying to teach, I got a job teaching gin Saudi Arabia that didn't go as planned and I only stayed for three months it was very stressful and I was housed in an empty flatshare and I was given an allowance to buy the furniture, I bought a single bed and a clothes rail for the bedroom to strat with, I took a photo and there it was a room with a bed and a clothes rail and a few book slung on the floor in the corner of the room, one of the books was a dictionary and I thought of the fact in the article ' Some 63 million had basic literacy - they could understand information in a pamphlet about serving on a jury. Ninety-five million had intermediate literacy - they could look something up in a dictionary or encyclopaedia.' and it made me a bit indignant and frustrated given that my level was way above that but life remained so difficult. (No offence intended just frustration and indignation)

Sponsored