Oxbridge influence over key public roles laid bare

New research has demonstrated the monopoly of a small social elite over public leadership positions in Britain

八月 28, 2014

The research, carried out by the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission, analysed the educational backgrounds of more than 4,000 people in positions of power.

It found that those educated at independent schools and Oxbridge were severely overrepresented in this group.

Among the most dramatic findings: 71 per cent of senior judges, 62 per cent of senior armed forces officers, 55 per cent of civil service permanent secretaries, and 53 per cent of senior diplomats had attended independent schools – compared with 7 per cent of the UK population as a whole.

The Commission – formed as part of the Child Poverty Act of 2010 to improve social mobility – also found that 75 per cent of senior judges, 59 per cent of the Cabinet and 50 per cent of diplomats had attended Oxbridge. Less than one per cent of the general public go to the universities of Oxford or Cambridge.

Chair of the commission, former Labour Cabinet minister Alan Milburn, said the findings showed that efforts by successive governments to improve the professional prospects of the poor had failed. “The institutions that matter appear to be a cosy club. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that Britain is deeply elitist,” he said.

Of the FTSE 350 chief executives educated in Britain, 41 per cent went to private school. Of those in the Sunday Times Rich List 60 per cent were educated privately, whereas over a quarter of those on the Rich List did not attend university.

The study also found that the judiciary is the professional group whose members benefitted from the most advantaged educational backgrounds, with 14 per cent of judges having attended one of five elite independent schools: Eton, Westminster and St Paul’s Boys’ School among them.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

The Independent schools tend to generate the majority of the top scores at 'A' level, and when topped up with high performing State school students, university league tables reflect this pattern. Better State schools and a more varied portfolio of degree courses representative of the modern professions at the very top ranked universities could perhaps with help graduate diversification.
The performance of schools seems generally most related to levels of GDP per capita, seemingly reflected in affluent families gravitating to the localities possessing 'good' local State schools or affordable Independent schools. Whether specifically intensified Ofsted inspection or experimentation with different types of State schools markedly impacts presumably remains 'a work in progress'. I suspect a more successful, productive and richer national economy holds the important key to improving real educational opportunities.
ADVERTISEMENT