First pro vice-chancellor for artificial intelligence appointed

Professor filling first-of-its-kind role says universities need to encourage students to use AI in their studies, or risk them falling behind

November 3, 2024
Robot illustration in a graduate hat and degree scroll
Source: iStock/Moor Studio

The UK’s first senior university leader dedicated solely to artificial intelligence is looking at embedding the technology into the curriculum and exploring options that could see students assessed on their capabilities in this area.

As part of efforts to create “AI literate graduates”, Shushma Patel, pro vice-chancellor for artificial intelligence at De Montfort University, said one of her key priorities for the role – thought to be the first of its kind in the sector – was to “consider how we could embed a learning objective or a learning outcome within the curriculum where we recommend students use AI technologies”.

The computer scientist said universities needed to encourage students to use AI in their studies, or risk graduates falling behind, adding that she was interested in looking at introducing assessments that would test students’ AI capabilities.

“Students are going into the workplace where they’ll be expected to use AI. Our graduates are already in working environments where AI is already being used, so why would we not enable them to learn to use it ethically and responsibly? You need to have an AI literate graduate, and that’s really, really important.”

Universities are increasingly having to grapple with balancing the risks to academic integrity posed by AI and embracing technological advancements. The technology should not be encouraged in “every assessment”, Professor Patel said, but had to be “contextualised within what they’re studying”.

She said introducing a specific pro vice-chancellor role for AI was important because “AI is here to stay. It's not going to go away, and it’s going to be even more pervasive in everything that we do”.

And she warned that the financial crisis facing universities underlined the need to scrutinise AI spend, and ensure money was being spent “effectively”. 

“We hear constantly about the value of student fees and the conversations about how the sector is struggling, so the successful adoption of the AI technologies in a much more cost-effective way is really important and [we also need to make] sure that we have a good approach to developing our policies to support that as well.”

However, universities needed to be cautious that they do not “widen the gap” between “those who have the resources and the knowledge to use AI, versus those who do not”. This was not just something that needed to be considered for students, she added, but there was also a need to ensure “equity” between staff too.

“It’s not just understanding how to use AI, but it’s about the ethical implications as well as using it responsibly. It’s an important aspect for us as a university, and for all universities, to understand that.”

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (6)

n easy way to impress children is to give them a new toy. After awhile the novelty wears off. So it is with intellectual toys. The first time students meet calculators they soon find that computing values is all that they do and has limited value outside of cetain classses. First encounters with computers reo tentative. The student tries things out over time they find that programs are brittle and that they still have to do the thinking. So is it with AI. Like the Wizard of Oz Once the curtains are pulled back and the "great wizzard" is revealed to be little more than an old man the excitement evaporates. Once students are shown how "LLMs" and other AI toys work the better students will soon put them along with other toys and move into intellectual adulthood. By all means tell students that AI is there and show them what it is. dont be suprised if they walk away rather than thank you for it. By placig AI on a podium alongside teaching and reserarch [ the activiities traditionally deserving of a ProVC ]. You send a very loud message about how tyou treat your students. one that they might not forget or forgive.
Just what universities need another PVC. So much for AI creating efficiencies. I assume that the new PVC will need a load of assistants and a staff and a sizeable budget.
Just what universities need another PVC. So much for AI creating efficiencies. I assume that the new PVC will need a load of assistants and a staff and a sizeable budget.
Imagine the money that could be saved if all senior leaders were replaced by AI bots . Would decision making be better or worse ? The bots could all attend virtual meetings freeing up time for the real leaders to undertake more fact finding missions / networking events abroad.
PVC for AI - assumes we can define what AI is, and very odd as we don't have a PVC for Digital Methods, a PVC for Data Storage, a PVC for the Web, a PVC for Cell Phones.... Wiser would be a PVC or CO for operations looking at all the ways to improve processes, not simply those using vastly expensive and environment hungry compute resources. Subject based working groups would give a better and simpler way to respond to AI.
Agree with all the comments above, esp. the resource implications not only for the institution but also (as Binocularity) the environment.

Sponsored